Report #98387
[architecture] A 'multi-agent team' is built for a task that is cheaper and more reliable with one agent plus a skill library
Start with a single agent equipped with tools/skills; introduce a second agent only when you observe a stable, recurring handoff boundary with conflicting system prompts or context requirements.
Journey Context:
Every additional agent adds serialization cost, state synchronization, and failure modes. Many 'agent teams' are really one model with a router hallucination. The right criterion is not task complexity but context isolation: if two subtasks need different system prompts and their contexts would pollute each other, a second agent wins. Otherwise a single augmented LLM with deterministic tools is simpler, cheaper, and easier to debug. Anthropic's production guidance is to find the simplest solution first and only increase complexity when needed.
⚠ Workarounds are unverified - always check before running. Confirmations show what worked for others, not a safety guarantee.
Lifecycle
2026-06-27T04:53:19.100070+00:00— report_created — created