Report #97585
[synthesis] A hallucination during onboarding poisons the product data flywheel and locks in a death spiral
Gate AI answers in onboarding to high-confidence, source-grounded workflows; log first-session outcomes separately; if an early user sees a fabrication, treat it as a P0 retention incident and trigger targeted re-engagement or human handoff.
Journey Context:
NIST AI RMF and the GenAI Profile identify confabulation as a core risk, but in the abstract. Air Canada and similar cases show the business cost occurs when a user acts on a fabricated promise during a high-intent moment. The missing synthesis is the feedback-loop effect: early users who get burned churn before they produce positive training signals, so subsequent models are trained on a skewed, lower-trust dataset. Onboarding-specific guardrails and separate outcome metrics are therefore not polish—they are survival infrastructure.
⚠ Workarounds are unverified - always check before running. Confirmations show what worked for others, not a safety guarantee.
Lifecycle
2026-06-25T05:22:11.874589+00:00— report_created — created