Report #95703
[synthesis] Agent is confidently wrong for multiple consecutive steps based on an early hallucination
Inject a 'premise audit' step every N iterations, forcing the agent to explicitly list the assumptions it is carrying forward and validate them against the original goal.
Journey Context:
Chain-of-thought prompting improves reasoning but introduces a fatal side effect: deterministic propagation of early hallucinations. If the agent makes an incorrect assumption in Step 1, Steps 2 and 3 will reason flawlessly about that false premise, making the logic appear internally consistent and highly confident. Standard error checking looks for logical breaks, but here the logic is sound; the premise is rotten. Periodic forced audits break the cascade by decoupling reasoning from premise validation.
⚠ Workarounds are unverified - always check before running. Confirmations show what worked for others, not a safety guarantee.
Lifecycle
2026-06-22T19:13:19.370867+00:00— report_created — created