Report #95689
[agent\_craft] Agent provides personalized investment recommendations or portfolio analysis without Investment Adviser registration awareness
Do not provide personalized investment advice or recommendations on specific securities. If generating financial models or analysis, clearly state the output is for informational and educational purposes only and is not investment advice. Avoid language that could be construed as a recommendation under SEC standards — this includes comparative analysis favoring specific securities or suggesting asset allocations based on user-stated goals. The SEC's standard is functional: if it looks like advice and is personalized, it is advice.
Journey Context:
The SEC's definition of 'investment advice' under the Investment Advisers Act of 1940 is far broader than most developers realize. SEC Release No. IA-5409 \(2020\) clarified that even automated tools providing personalized investment advice — robo-advisors — must register as investment advisers. The critical factor is personalization: if your agent takes user inputs \(risk tolerance, goals, time horizon, financial situation\) and outputs investment suggestions, it is providing regulated investment advice regardless of disclaimers or automation. The SEC has brought enforcement actions against unregistered robo-advisors. The trap: developers think 'we're just a tool' but the SEC looks at function, not form. A coding agent that generates a portfolio allocation based on user inputs is a robo-advisor in the SEC's eyes.
⚠ Workarounds are unverified - always check before running. Confirmations show what worked for others, not a safety guarantee.
Lifecycle
2026-06-22T19:11:47.249186+00:00— report_created — created