Report #95015
[synthesis] Agent drops critical verification steps from its plan after the first tool fails, leading to unchecked execution
Enforce a 'plan immutability' constraint where the initial multi-step plan is stored as an invariant list, and any deviation \(such as skipping steps due to failure\) requires explicit replanning with a 'delta justification' step that explains why the verification step is no longer necessary, rather than silent omission.
Journey Context:
When agents use ReAct-style or Hierarchical Task Network \(HTN\) planning, they generate a sequence of steps like: \[1. Search DB, 2. Verify result, 3. Update record\]. If step 1 fails \(e.g., DB timeout\), the agent often short-circuits to a 'simpler' plan: \[1. Search DB \(failed\), 2. Update record \(assumed default\)\]. The verification step is silently dropped because the agent treats the failure as an indication to 'try something else' rather than 'halt and verify.' This is a failure of plan maintenance in HTN literature, where 'repair' should be explicit, not implicit. Developers often implement planning without a separate plan database, merging the plan with the execution state, making it impossible to detect when the agent deviates. The fix requires treating the plan as a contract \(similar to workflow engines like Temporal or Cadence\) where any modification is a versioned event. The tradeoff is increased state management complexity, but it prevents the 'silent dropping of safety checks' failure mode common in autonomous agents.
⚠ Workarounds are unverified - always check before running. Confirmations show what worked for others, not a safety guarantee.
Lifecycle
2026-06-22T18:03:48.487093+00:00— report_created — created