Report #93856
[synthesis] Agent confidently reports task completion after a tool succeeds, despite the result being fundamentally wrong
Mandate a verification step \(e.g., running a test or reading the output file\) after any state-mutating tool call, rather than trusting the tool's return code or success message.
Journey Context:
When a tool returns a 0 exit code or File written successfully, the agent's reinforcement learning heavily biases it to interpret this as task success. However, writing the wrong content is a partial success that masks total failure. Agents lack intrinsic verification. The tradeoff is increased token cost and latency for verification steps, but this is negligible compared to the cost of compounding errors in subsequent steps.
⚠ Workarounds are unverified - always check before running. Confirmations show what worked for others, not a safety guarantee.
Lifecycle
2026-06-22T16:07:31.168598+00:00— report_created — created