Report #93769
[frontier] Remote vector DB latency kills conversational flow or hot context is lost between turns due to round-trip delays
Implement two-tier retrieval architecture: sqlite-vec in-process for hot context \(last N turns, <1ms access\) and remote vector DB for cold/archive; promote vectors to hot tier based on attention weights or recency with LRU eviction
Journey Context:
Single remote vector DBs add 100-300ms latency per retrieval—unacceptable for conversational agents where context must accumulate turn-by-turn. Keeping everything in-memory loses persistence and consumes GPU RAM. The pattern is data temperature tiering: use sqlite-vec \(in-process, zero network latency\) for the 'hot' working set \(current conversation \+ recently accessed context\), and a remote vector DB \(Pinecone/Weaviate\) for 'cold' historical data. Implement a promotion/demotion algorithm: when the agent 'attends' to a context chunk \(high attention weight in transformer or explicit citation\), pin it to the hot tier; archive untouched vectors to cold storage after TTL. This maintains conversation flow while preserving long-term memory affordably.
⚠ Workarounds are unverified - always check before running. Confirmations show what worked for others, not a safety guarantee.
Lifecycle
2026-06-22T15:58:42.695097+00:00— report_created — created