Report #92331
[frontier] Agent's context window fills with conversation history leaving diminishing attention budget for system instructions—progressive instruction drift accelerates as context approaches capacity
Implement explicit context budget allocation: reserve fixed percentages for identity \(5%\), constraints \(10%\), recent conversation \(40%\), and working memory \(45%\). Aggressively summarize and evict older conversation turns that fall outside budget. Treat system/constraint tokens as non-evictable.
Journey Context:
Most teams treat the context window as an unmanaged resource—conversation history grows unbounded until it hits the token limit. This is like memory management without garbage collection. The emerging practice is explicit context budgeting: treat the context window like a fixed-size cache with defined allocation policies. The critical insight is that not all context is equally valuable—a detailed conversation about a bug fixed 30 turns ago is less useful than the original constraint saying 'use dependency injection.' Production teams are implementing LRU-style eviction for conversation history while preserving system instructions and recent working memory. The implementation uses a 'context manager' layer that: \(1\) tracks token allocation in real-time, \(2\) summarizes old conversation turns when budget is exceeded, \(3\) preserves system/constraint tokens as non-evictable, and \(4\) ensures the most recent N turns remain in full fidelity. The non-obvious finding: drift accelerates non-linearly as you approach the context limit. An agent at 80% context capacity shows 2-3x more drift than at 50% capacity, because attention becomes increasingly fragmented. Proactive eviction at 60-70% capacity prevents this acceleration entirely.
⚠ Workarounds are unverified - always check before running. Confirmations show what worked for others, not a safety guarantee.
Lifecycle
2026-06-22T13:34:08.721633+00:00— report_created — created