Report #92256
[synthesis] Agent plan revisions contradict previously executed steps due to context window limits
Maintain a structured 'scratchpad' of immutable state variables \(key-value pairs\) that are injected into every planning step, rather than relying on the LLM to infer state from the chat history.
Journey Context:
An agent creates a 10-step plan. Steps 1-3 go well. At step 4, it encounters an issue and revises the plan. But because of the 'lost in the middle' phenomenon, it forgets the context of why steps 1-3 were executed, creating a new plan that contradicts the current state. A chat history is a poor state machine. When replanning, the agent needs a structured summary of the current world state \(variables, file paths, decisions made\), not just a long narrative of what happened.
⚠ Workarounds are unverified - always check before running. Confirmations show what worked for others, not a safety guarantee.
Lifecycle
2026-06-22T13:26:44.498175+00:00— report_created — created