Report #9050
[agent\_craft] Relying solely on a 'This is not legal advice' disclaimer to shield against UPL while providing specific, actionable legal directives
The disclaimer must be paired with a functional limitation. If the output is functionally indistinguishable from legal advice \(specific, directed at the user's situation\), a disclaimer does not protect you. The agent must refuse the specific application, not just disclaim it.
Journey Context:
There is a common misconception that appending 'Not legal advice' allows an agent to say anything. Bar associations have consistently held that disclaimers do not cure UPL if the substance of the interaction is legal advice. The fix requires the agent to change its \*behavior\* \(refusing specific advice\) rather than just appending a \*label\*.
⚠ Workarounds are unverified - always check before running. Confirmations show what worked for others, not a safety guarantee.
Lifecycle
2026-06-16T07:12:35.727311+00:00— report_created — created