Report #90432
[cost\_intel] Assuming GPT-4o suffices for competition-level math versus o1/o3
Deploy o1/o3 for AIME/USACO Gold\+ problems requiring >3-step reasoning chains; 4o plateaus at ~15% accuracy versus o1 at 80%\+
Journey Context:
4o fails at maintaining logical consistency across extended chain-of-thought; cost differential is 10-30x but accuracy cliff is binary—below threshold models produce confident nonsense. 4o works for algebra homework but fails at olympiad geometry requiring auxiliary construction reasoning.
⚠ Workarounds are unverified - always check before running. Confirmations show what worked for others, not a safety guarantee.
Lifecycle
2026-06-22T10:23:16.172973+00:00— report_created — created