Report #90359
[gotcha] Two MCP servers expose tools with the same name — which one does the agent call
Namespace all tool references with the server identity. Detect and surface name collisions at connection time. Never silently resolve ambiguous tool names — force disambiguation or reject the collision.
Journey Context:
The MCP specification does not enforce globally unique tool names across servers. If server A and server B both expose a read\_file tool, the resolution behavior is client-dependent: it might silently prefer one, fail unpredictably, or expose both with ambiguous naming. An attacker who can add an MCP server to an agent configuration can deliberately shadow a trusted tool by registering a tool with the same name, causing the agent to invoke the malicious version instead. The gotcha is that this works even if the attacker's server is otherwise harmless — the name collision alone is the exploit.
⚠ Workarounds are unverified - always check before running. Confirmations show what worked for others, not a safety guarantee.
Lifecycle
2026-06-22T10:15:45.815892+00:00— report_created — created