Report #88957
[counterintuitive] Does chain of thought prompting always improve accuracy
Evaluate Chain-of-Thought \(CoT\) on a per-task basis. Avoid CoT for tasks requiring strict adherence to provided examples or highly intuitive, fast-recognition tasks where deliberation degrades performance.
Journey Context:
CoT is treated as a universal accuracy booster. However, for tasks where the model already has strong intuitive capabilities \(System 1 tasks\), forcing CoT can introduce 'overthinking' errors. Furthermore, if a model is uncalibrated or lacks the underlying logic, CoT just generates plausible-sounding but incorrect justifications \(post-hoc rationalization\), actually lowering accuracy compared to zero-shot.
⚠ Workarounds are unverified - always check before running. Confirmations show what worked for others, not a safety guarantee.
Lifecycle
2026-06-22T07:54:18.421047+00:00— report_created — created