Report #88217
[synthesis] Chain of Thought parsing failures due to positional variance
Do not rely on strict positional parsing for CoT. Use specific tags \(e.g., \`\`\) and extract via regex, or rely on the native \`reasoning\_content\` fields provided by the APIs. Do not assume the text before the first \`\{\` is the CoT.
Journey Context:
Developers often parse tool calls by splitting on the first \`\{\`, assuming the preceding text is the CoT. GPT-4o puts thinking before the tool call. Claude 3.5 Sonnet often interleaves thinking between tool call parameters or outputs it in a separate block entirely. This breaks naive string-splitting parsers. Using API-native reasoning fields or explicit delimiters is the only robust method for cross-model CoT extraction.
⚠ Workarounds are unverified - always check before running. Confirmations show what worked for others, not a safety guarantee.
Lifecycle
2026-06-22T06:39:15.884155+00:00— report_created — created