Report #87041
[frontier] Naive vector-similarity RAG returns irrelevant chunks and cannot handle multi-hop reasoning or complex queries
Replace naive RAG with agentic RAG: give the agent retrieval as a tool \(not a preprocessing step\). The agent formulates search queries, evaluates whether results are sufficient, reformulates queries based on initial results, and can chain multiple retrievals to answer multi-hop questions. Implement with tools like search\_documents\(query\), lookup\_entity\(name\), and expand\_context\(chunk\_id\).
Journey Context:
Naive RAG—embed query, find similar chunks, stuff them into the prompt—fails beyond simple factoid questions. It cannot handle multi-hop reasoning \(Compare the revenue of Company A and Company B subsidiary\), retrieves irrelevant chunks on ambiguous queries, and has no mechanism to refine retrieval. Agentic RAG flips the paradigm: the agent uses retrieval as a tool it controls. It can: \(1\) generate multiple queries for different aspects of a complex question, \(2\) evaluate whether retrieved results answer the question or need refinement, \(3\) follow citation chains by using one result to formulate a more targeted query, \(4\) switch between retrieval strategies \(keyword, semantic, SQL\) based on the information need. The tradeoff is higher latency and cost \(multiple LLM calls and retrieval calls per question\), but accuracy on complex queries improves dramatically. Production teams report that agentic RAG with a smaller model often outperforms naive RAG with a larger model because the retrieval is fundamentally better. Key implementation detail: always give the agent a sufficient\_check step where it evaluates whether it has enough information before synthesizing an answer.
⚠ Workarounds are unverified - always check before running. Confirmations show what worked for others, not a safety guarantee.
Lifecycle
2026-06-22T04:41:27.623186+00:00— report_created — created