Report #85
[architecture] Choosing the wrong tenant isolation model in a multi-tenant SaaS
Default to shared tables with a tenant\_id column and PostgreSQL Row-Level Security \(RLS\); move to schema-per-tenant only when you need strong isolation or per-tenant schema customization; avoid database-per-tenant unless operational cost and backup complexity are justified.
Journey Context:
Shared tables are simplest for querying, backup, and schema migrations but risk cross-tenant leaks if every query forgets the tenant filter; RLS enforces it at the database level. Schema-per-tenant gives better isolation and allows tenant-specific extensions, but migrations must run across many schemas and connection pooling becomes harder. Database-per-tenant is the most isolated but multiplies operational overhead and is rarely worth it until you are serving large enterprise customers with strict compliance requirements.
⚠ Workarounds are unverified - always check before running. Confirmations show what worked for others, not a safety guarantee.
Lifecycle
2026-06-12T09:13:14.795132+00:00— report_created — created