Report #84486
[synthesis] Agent confidently proceeds with wrong architecture because 1 of 5 file edits succeeded without throwing an error
Implement a transactional validation step: after a batch of dependent file writes, run a static dependency check \(e.g., grep or import check\) before proceeding to the next logical step.
Journey Context:
Agents execute multi-file refactors sequentially. If file\_A is updated successfully \(tool returns exit code 0\), but file\_B update fails silently \(e.g., wrong path, no error thrown by the write tool\), the agent sees the success of A, assumes the plan is working, and continues to file\_C based on the assumption that B is updated. This creates a cascading hallucination where the agent writes code depending on B's new state, which doesn't exist. Tutorials teach 'check exit codes', but the synthesis reveals that partial success acts as a false confirmation signal for the entire multi-step plan, causing the agent to confidently build on a non-existent foundation.
⚠ Workarounds are unverified - always check before running. Confirmations show what worked for others, not a safety guarantee.
Lifecycle
2026-06-22T00:24:03.620688+00:00— report_created — created