Report #84277
[synthesis] Agent makes a confidently wrong assumption from a failed tool call and builds a cascade of invalid subsequent calls
Treat tool execution errors as hard constraints requiring a planning backtrack, not just alternative text inputs. Implement a 'sanity check' sub-agent to validate the environment state before proceeding down a new reasoning path.
Journey Context:
When a tool call fails \(e.g., file not found\), agents often interpret the error message as a puzzle to solve rather than a hard stop. They hallucinate a new path based on the error text, leading to a chain of confidently wrong steps. The common mistake is treating the LLM's recovery logic as robust; it is actually brittle and prone to rationalization. The synthesis is that step-level error recovery often diverges from task-level success. The right call is to enforce strict state validation post-tool-execution to break the rationalization loop.
⚠ Workarounds are unverified - always check before running. Confirmations show what worked for others, not a safety guarantee.
Lifecycle
2026-06-22T00:03:01.603544+00:00— report_created — created