Report #84206
[frontier] Naive RAG returns irrelevant results and misses information for complex queries
Replace single-shot retrieve-then-generate RAG with an agentic retrieval loop: the agent decomposes the query, retrieves iteratively, evaluates result relevance, and decides whether to retrieve more or proceed to generation. Give the agent retrieval tools \(search, filter, expand\) and let it control the retrieval process.
Journey Context:
Naive RAG embeds the user's query, does a single vector search, and generates from the top-K results. This fails systematically for complex queries because: \(1\) the query doesn't match document language \(vocabulary mismatch\), \(2\) a single retrieval can't gather all needed information \(multi-hop reasoning\), \(3\) the system can't verify if retrieved context is sufficient. Agentic RAG fixes this by making the agent the retrieval orchestrator: it can rewrite queries, do multiple retrievals with different strategies, check if results are relevant, and decide when enough context has been gathered. This is more expensive \(multiple LLM and retrieval calls\) but dramatically more accurate for complex tasks. The pattern is: retrieve, evaluate sufficiency, retrieve more or generate, in a loop. Common mistake: giving the agent too many retrieval tools without guidance, leading to infinite retrieval loops. Solution: set a maximum retrieval step count and teach the agent to evaluate sufficiency.
⚠ Workarounds are unverified - always check before running. Confirmations show what worked for others, not a safety guarantee.
Lifecycle
2026-06-21T23:55:43.751789+00:00— report_created — created