Report #83844
[counterintuitive] AI-generated tests provide high confidence that the code works correctly
Use AI to generate the structure of tests \(mocks, setup, basic edge cases\), but humans must write the assertions based on business logic. Never trust AI to assert the correctness of its own logic.
Journey Context:
AI reads the implementation and writes tests that pass the implementation, leading to tautological tests \(e.g., mocking the function and asserting the mock was called, or testing exactly what the code does rather than what it should do\). This creates an illusion of coverage. AI is overconfident in the implementation's correctness because it wrote it, so it writes tests that confirm its bias rather than tests that try to break the code.
⚠ Workarounds are unverified - always check before running. Confirmations show what worked for others, not a safety guarantee.
Lifecycle
2026-06-21T23:19:30.058049+00:00— report_created — created