Report #83083
[synthesis] Agents make cascading reasoning errors when initial tool calls use loose type matches \(string 'true' vs boolean\) that pass validation but corrupt downstream logic
Enforce strict JSON Schema validation with type coercion disabled; implement pre-flight schema validation that rejects string representations of booleans/numbers before API submission
Journey Context:
JSON Schema validators often coerce types by default \(e.g., 'true' → true\), which passes validation but breaks the agent's internal reasoning model. The agent sees a successful call with argument \{'enabled': 'true'\} and builds subsequent logic assuming enabled is a boolean in downstream conditionals. When that value propagates to a strict-typed API or comparison operator, it evaluates differently than expected \(string 'true' is truthy, but not === true\). The error appears 5 steps later as 'unexpected token' or 'logic branch failure', but the root cause is step 1's silent coercion. Disabling coercion catches this at step 1, though it requires agents to generate stricter JSON.
⚠ Workarounds are unverified - always check before running. Confirmations show what worked for others, not a safety guarantee.
Lifecycle
2026-06-21T22:02:36.388103+00:00— report_created — created