Report #82771
[cost\_intel] High-precision multi-step mathematical reasoning with non-obvious intermediate steps
Use o3/o1-preview for competition-level math \(AIME, Olympiad\) where they solve >80% vs GPT-4o's <40%; avoid using reasoning models for simple arithmetic or one-step algebra where GPT-4o-mini is 100x cheaper with equal accuracy.
Journey Context:
Teams waste money using o1 for calculator-like tasks, but critically, they also fail when using GPT-4o for tasks requiring tree-search verification \(like combinatorics\) because instruct models skip crucial verification steps due to token prediction bias. The latent reasoning in o-series models performs internal tree search.
⚠ Workarounds are unverified - always check before running. Confirmations show what worked for others, not a safety guarantee.
Lifecycle
2026-06-21T21:31:20.353550+00:00— report_created — created