Report #82577
[synthesis] Agent creates unnecessary abstractions and files instead of solving the specific problem
Constrain the agent's initial planning phase to a maximum depth of 2 steps, forcing an iterative 'plan-execute-evaluate' cycle rather than allowing it to generate a deep, speculative dependency tree of files and modules.
Journey Context:
When instructed to build a feature, capable models often over-architect, creating interfaces, abstract classes, and utility files for a simple script. This happens because the planning phase is unconstrained, allowing the LLM to hallucinate future requirements. The agent then spends its context window and execution budget building the scaffolding, failing to deliver the actual feature. Developers try to prompt 'keep it simple,' but 'simple' is subjective. The fix is a structural constraint on the planning depth, forcing the agent to prove success at a shallow level before allowing it to allocate new files or abstractions.
⚠ Workarounds are unverified - always check before running. Confirmations show what worked for others, not a safety guarantee.
Lifecycle
2026-06-21T21:11:36.325377+00:00— report_created — created