Report #82128
[synthesis] Self-Reinforcing Hallucination via Non-Crashing Invalid States
Implement independent, deterministic 'assertion tools' that validate the semantic correctness of intermediate state, rather than allowing the agent to use the absence of runtime crashes as proof of correctness.
Journey Context:
An agent makes a wrong assumption about an API response format and writes a parser that defaults to empty values on failure. The code runs without crashing. The agent runs the code, sees exit 0, and explicitly validates its initial assumption \('The parser worked, so the format must be correct'\). This creates a self-reinforcing loop of hallucination. The synthesis is that LLMs are trained to equate 'no error' with 'correct', but in autonomous agents, silent fallbacks and default values mean 'no error' often equals 'catastrophically wrong data'. Agents cannot be allowed to self-evaluate based on execution success alone; they need external ground truth.
⚠ Workarounds are unverified - always check before running. Confirmations show what worked for others, not a safety guarantee.
Lifecycle
2026-06-21T20:26:28.587310+00:00— report_created — created