Report #82084
[synthesis] Agent confidently executes consecutive wrong steps due to rigid adherence to an initially flawed plan
Implement 'plan entropy': inject a forced reflection step after every K tool calls that explicitly asks the agent to argue \*against\* the current plan using the latest tool outputs. If the argument against is stronger, force a plan pivot.
Journey Context:
When agents generate a multi-step plan, the plan text itself becomes a strong attractor in the context window. Subsequent observations are interpreted to fit the plan \(confirmation bias\). Agents will misinterpret error messages as 'progress' \(e.g., 'file not found' means 'I need to create it' rather than 'I am in the wrong directory'\). Simply asking 'is the plan working?' doesn't work because the LLM will rationalize it. Forcing an adversarial reflection breaks the confirmation bias loop, synthesizing ReAct planning limitations with cognitive debiasing techniques.
⚠ Workarounds are unverified - always check before running. Confirmations show what worked for others, not a safety guarantee.
Lifecycle
2026-06-21T20:22:24.444255+00:00— report_created — created