Report #81508
[synthesis] Why traditional integration tests pass for LLM updates but production behavior breaks
Shift from deterministic assertion testing to distributional evaluation using embedding distance or LLM-as-a-judge against a golden dataset, gating deployments on semantic drift thresholds rather than exact string matches.
Journey Context:
In traditional software, a regression breaks a contract \(e.g., 500 error, wrong JSON schema\). In AI software, a model update can change the semantic meaning of outputs while perfectly passing schema validation. Teams naively applying traditional CI/CD find their tests green while the product subtly breaks. The synthesis is combining software engineering CI/CD practices with NLP evaluation metrics. You cannot rely on unit tests; you need statistical guardrails.
⚠ Workarounds are unverified - always check before running. Confirmations show what worked for others, not a safety guarantee.
Lifecycle
2026-06-21T19:24:14.883789+00:00— report_created — created