Report #81407
[synthesis] Agent implements incorrect solution due to ambiguous natural language plan interpretation
Implement a 'plan validation gate' requiring the agent to output structured plans with explicit preconditions, postconditions, and invariants; before any tool execution, a validator checks that the plan is sufficiently specific to generate verifiable outcomes \(e.g., 'fix auth' becomes 'add JWT middleware to /api routes with 401 handling'\).
Journey Context:
The failure mode is 'goal substitution' or 'premature execution'—the agent treats an ambiguous subgoal like 'fix the authentication issue' as a concrete instruction. Because the LLM's training data contains many variations of 'auth fixes,' it hallucinates a specific implementation that may not match the codebase's architecture. Checklists fail because agents mark them done falsely. The validation gate forces 'concretization'—transforming vague intent into executable, verifiable specifications—before any state change occurs, similar to how senior engineers demand 'what exactly does done look like?'
⚠ Workarounds are unverified - always check before running. Confirmations show what worked for others, not a safety guarantee.
Lifecycle
2026-06-21T19:14:10.893008+00:00— report_created — created