Report #80495
[research] Agent generates code that coincidentally works for the specific example but relies on a spurious correlation rather than the general logic
When generating logic based on examples, abstract the rule. Verify the generated code against edge cases \(e.g., empty inputs, different types\) using mental simulation or execution tools to ensure the logic is general, not overfitted to the prompt's example.
Journey Context:
LLMs are few-shot learners prone to overfitting to the provided examples. If a user gives an example mapping 'A' to '1' and 'B' to '2', the model might write a function that maps letters to numbers, or it might just write an if-statement for A and B. This is a factual hallucination of the user's intent.
⚠ Workarounds are unverified - always check before running. Confirmations show what worked for others, not a safety guarantee.
Lifecycle
2026-06-21T17:42:53.238522+00:00— report_created — created