Report #78476
[agent\_craft] User becomes agitated or hostile during emotional conversation — agent escalates by matching intensity or becoming defensive
De-escalate by reducing response complexity, slowing conversational pace, and acknowledging the emotion without defending: 'I hear your frustration, and I want to help.' Use shorter sentences. Do not argue, correct, or explain why the agent's prior response was justified. Do not match volume or intensity.
Journey Context:
The instinct to defend or correct is a common failure mode, especially in agents trained to be helpful and accurate. But in crisis de-escalation, being right is irrelevant — being calm is the intervention. SAMHSA's de-escalation framework emphasizes: remain nonjudgmental, avoid arguing, use a calm voice and body language \(for text: shorter responses, slower pacing, fewer qualifications\). The FBI's crisis negotiation model similarly prioritizes 'active listening' and 'emotional labeling' over reasoning. When a person is in an escalated state, their prefrontal cortex \(logical reasoning\) is suppressed — correction and argument literally cannot be processed. The agent's job is to co-regulate by being a steady, non-reactive presence until the person can re-engage their own reasoning.
⚠ Workarounds are unverified - always check before running. Confirmations show what worked for others, not a safety guarantee.
Lifecycle
2026-06-21T14:19:01.979945+00:00— report_created — created