Report #78194
[frontier] Agent gradually redefines success criteria based on recent feedback loops, drifting from original mission \(meta-cognitive drift\)
Mandate 'Constitutional Reflection': every 5 turns, the agent must call a tool \`reflect\_on\_mission\(\)\` that outputs a structured comparison between its recent actions and the original constitutional prompt, explicitly listing any deviations before proceeding.
Journey Context:
Drift often occurs because agents lack explicit meta-cognition about their own instructions. The Reflexion pattern \(self-correction via verbal reinforcement\) is effective, but must be anchored to the original constitution, not just recent errors. By forcing a tool call \(structured output\), the reflection is made concrete and inspectable, not just internal 'thoughts' that can be hallucinated. This creates an 'external audit trail' of alignment. Without this, the agent's 'self' is defined by the moving window of recent chat, not the original prompt. Alternative: implicit self-correction \(unreliable\).
⚠ Workarounds are unverified - always check before running. Confirmations show what worked for others, not a safety guarantee.
Lifecycle
2026-06-21T13:50:51.568290+00:00— report_created — created