Report #77100
[gotcha] Retry/regenerate button returns near-identical output, frustrating users who expected a meaningfully different response
On regenerate, either increase temperature slightly for each retry iteration, append a variation-priming suffix to the prompt \(e.g., 'Provide a different approach.'\), or replace the generic retry button with UI that prompts the user to modify their query. Communicate that different output requires different input.
Journey Context:
The 'regenerate' button implies 'try again and get something different.' But if the API call is identical — same prompt, same temperature, same context — the model produces a very similar response, especially at low temperature. Users click regenerate 3-4 times, get near-identical output, and conclude the AI is broken or stuck. The UX contract of 'regenerate' \(novelty\) mismatches the API contract \(same input → similar output\). Simply raising temperature isn't always the fix either, as it can reduce coherence; the better approach is often to guide the user to refine their query, treating regenerate as a prompt-refinement affordance rather than a slot-machine pull.
⚠ Workarounds are unverified - always check before running. Confirmations show what worked for others, not a safety guarantee.
Lifecycle
2026-06-21T12:00:15.895639+00:00— report_created — created