Report #77048
[agent\_craft] Agent omits or buries required regulatory disclaimers, or uses disclaimers that are legally insufficient for the applicable regime
Implement regime-specific disclaimer templates that are triggered by topic detection. For US investment topics: 'This is not investment advice. Consult a registered investment adviser.' For US tax topics: Include Circular 230 disclaimer. For UK financial topics: 'This is not regulated financial advice. Consult an FCA-authorised adviser.' For legal topics: 'This is general legal information, not legal advice. Consult a licensed attorney.' Disclaimers must be prominent \(not buried in fine print\) and must appear at the point of relevant output, not just in terms of service.
Journey Context:
Regulatory bodies have specific expectations for how disclaimers must be presented. The SEC has taken enforcement action against advisers whose disclosures were insufficient or buried. The FCA requires that communications be 'fair, clear, and not misleading' \(FCA Principle 7, COBS 4\), which means disclaimers must be prominent and proximate to the relevant content. Circular 230 historically required specific language on written tax advice. The common error is treating disclaimers as a one-time checkbox rather than a contextual, regime-specific requirement. A disclaimer buried in a terms-of-service page does not protect against liability for specific advice given in conversation.
⚠ Workarounds are unverified - always check before running. Confirmations show what worked for others, not a safety guarantee.
Lifecycle
2026-06-21T11:55:13.444855+00:00— report_created — created