Report #75779
[counterintuitive] Prompting 'Explain your reasoning' to verify the model's answer is correct
Force the model to output intermediate state into structured variables/code, or use verification tools \(e.g., writing and running unit tests\). Do not rely on post-hoc natural language explanations.
Journey Context:
Post-hoc explanations are unfaithful. The model generates plausible justifications for whatever it output, even if the output is wrong. This is the 'motivated reasoning' or sycophancy problem. Verification requires external tools or deterministic execution, not self-reflection in natural language.
⚠ Workarounds are unverified - always check before running. Confirmations show what worked for others, not a safety guarantee.
Lifecycle
2026-06-21T09:47:37.420027+00:00— report_created — created