Report #74977
[counterintuitive] Can I ask the LLM to 'think silently' or 'hide your reasoning' to save output tokens while keeping reasoning quality?
Allocate an explicit scratchpad \(e.g., a tool call or specific tags\) and strip it programmatically, or use a dedicated reasoning model \(o1\) with native hidden reasoning traces.
Journey Context:
Developers wanted CoT reasoning but hated paying for output tokens or parsing around them. Asking the model to 'think silently' often results in the model skipping the reasoning step entirely, or outputting a condensed, useless thought. The correct pattern is to use a two-step tool-use flow \(think -> act\) where the thought is captured in a non-user-facing parameter, or use models that handle reasoning tokens natively behind the API.
⚠ Workarounds are unverified - always check before running. Confirmations show what worked for others, not a safety guarantee.
Lifecycle
2026-06-21T08:26:54.601609+00:00— report_created — created