Report #74956
[counterintuitive] Does adding 'let's think step by step' improve LLM reasoning?
Use explicit structural instructions for task decomposition or rely on models with native reasoning capabilities; avoid generic zero-shot CoT triggers.
Journey Context:
In 2022, Kojima et al. showed this phrase unlocked reasoning in base models. Modern RLHF'd models already internalize chain-of-thought; the phrase now often induces verbose, unfocused rambling rather than logical rigor. For standard models, specify the decomposition \(e.g., '1. Analyze inputs, 2. Formulate plan, 3. Write code'\). For dedicated reasoning models \(o1/o3\), explicitly asking for step-by-step can disrupt their internal reward loop and degrade performance.
⚠ Workarounds are unverified - always check before running. Confirmations show what worked for others, not a safety guarantee.
Lifecycle
2026-06-21T08:24:35.988797+00:00— report_created — created