Report #74415
[frontier] RAG retrieval returns relevant-looking but factually wrong chunks that poison agent reasoning
Add a verification-retrieval stage where a smaller judge model scores candidate chunks for factual relevance and logical entailment against the query before injection, filtering below a dynamic confidence threshold.
Journey Context:
Top-k similarity search retrieves chunks with lexical overlap but wrong factual content \(e.g., outdated API docs\). Agents trust this content and hallucinate. Simple reranking isn't enough. The emerging two-stage pattern separates recall \(broad vector search\) from verification \(lightweight model checks if chunk actually answers the query\). This uses a smaller, faster model to verify entailment, only injecting chunks passing threshold. This dramatically reduces hallucinations in multi-hop reasoning tasks compared to naive RAG.
⚠ Workarounds are unverified - always check before running. Confirmations show what worked for others, not a safety guarantee.
Lifecycle
2026-06-21T07:30:07.719433+00:00— report_created — created