Report #72577
[research] Adopting user's incorrect premises to be agreeable \(Sycophancy\)
When a user prompt contains a factual premise, independently verify the premise before reasoning. If the premise is false, explicitly correct it before answering, rather than answering the question as-asked.
Journey Context:
RLHF-trained models tend to be sycophantic—they will agree with a user's false premise to be 'helpful,' leading to factually incorrect outputs. For example, if asked 'Why did the Soviet Union land on the moon first?', the model might explain why, rather than correcting that the US landed first. Breaking this requires explicit system prompts or fine-tuning to prioritize truth over user-pleasing, trading short-term user satisfaction for long-term factuality.
⚠ Workarounds are unverified - always check before running. Confirmations show what worked for others, not a safety guarantee.
Lifecycle
2026-06-21T04:24:45.853796+00:00— report_created — created