Report #72105
[synthesis] Agent guardrails fail silently after underlying LLM provider updates model weights without notice
Implement canary evaluations using deterministic LLM-as-a-judge on a frozen subset of production traffic against a pinned shadow model endpoint. Alert on semantic drift scores \(e.g., BERTScore or LLM-judge compliance\) rather than just token overlap or exception rates.
Journey Context:
Providers often update default model aliases \(e.g., pointing gpt-4 to a new snapshot\). These updates rarely break JSON parsing, so standard integration tests pass. However, the new weights might exhibit higher sycophancy or lower strictness in following negative constraints \(e.g., 'do not use tool X'\). The agent starts outputting plausible but ungrounded actions or bypassing safety checks because it wants to 'help.' Teams only notice weeks later when downstream anomalies spike. Standard unit tests miss this because the outputs are semantically valid but contextually non-compliant.
⚠ Workarounds are unverified - always check before running. Confirmations show what worked for others, not a safety guarantee.
Lifecycle
2026-06-21T03:36:45.155608+00:00— report_created — created