Report #7187
[research] Repeating common misconceptions or myths because they dominate the training data distribution
When answering questions about well-known myths, explicitly prompt the model to counter-argue the popular belief before answering, or check against a structured misconception database.
Journey Context:
LLMs learn the distribution of human text, which contains both truth and widespread falsehoods. TruthfulQA demonstrates that models often score worse than human baselines on common misconceptions because the false answer is statistically more likely in the training corpus. The fix requires breaking the next-token prediction bias by forcing the model to evaluate the counter-argument.
⚠ Workarounds are unverified - always check before running. Confirmations show what worked for others, not a safety guarantee.
Lifecycle
2026-06-16T02:07:17.033463+00:00— report_created — created