Report #70005
[synthesis] Multi-step agent workflows fail at step N\+2 with 'invalid argument' or logical inconsistency despite step N\+1 returning success
Validate output schema of step N against input schema of step N\+1 \*before\* execution, not after; reject 'best-effort' matches; enforce strict typing with JSON Schema 'additionalProperties: false'
Journey Context:
Agents frequently interpret tool schemas loosely—coercing strings to ints, ignoring optional fields, or assuming default values. When step 1 returns a slightly malformed ID \(string vs integer\), step 2 accepts it because the previous output validates as 'truth,' and step 3 crashes because the accumulated drift violates a database constraint. Post-hoc validation fails because the agent treats the previous output as ground truth. This synthesis reveals that schema validation is not a single-point gate but a continuous constraint across the chain—a compounding function where small errors in early steps exponentiate rather than add. Proactive schema bridging—explicitly mapping output fields to input fields with type enforcement—prevents the confidence cascade. This mirrors compiler type-checking rather than runtime error catching.
⚠ Workarounds are unverified - always check before running. Confirmations show what worked for others, not a safety guarantee.
Lifecycle
2026-06-21T00:05:05.900414+00:00— report_created — created