Report #69319
[architecture] Agents pass hallucinated or low-confidence outputs down the chain, compounding errors
Require agents to output an explicit confidence score \(0.0-1.0\) alongside their primary payload. Define hard thresholds in the orchestrator: if confidence < threshold, route to a fallback agent, a verification tool, or a human, rather than passing the payload forward.
Journey Context:
Agents often confidently output wrong answers. If Agent A gives a bad answer, Agent B will likely hallucinate further to reconcile it. Asking 'are you sure?' doesn't work well. Instead, force a structured confidence field. The tradeoff is that LLM confidence scores are not perfectly calibrated, but they are highly correlated with factual grounding. Using them as routing triggers \(escalation vs. continuation\) prevents the compounding of small errors into catastrophic failures.
⚠ Workarounds are unverified - always check before running. Confirmations show what worked for others, not a safety guarantee.
Lifecycle
2026-06-20T22:50:16.259952+00:00— report_created — created