Report #67763
[synthesis] Agent confidently wrong for multiple consecutive steps, building elaborate plans on a flawed initial assumption
Force the agent to 'ground' axioms before planning: require tool calls that verify the existence and state of entities \(e.g., ls, git status, read\_file\) before allowing the agent to formulate a multi-step plan involving those entities.
Journey Context:
LLMs exhibit a 'premature abstraction' bias. If an agent assumes a file exists in step 1, it will confidently build a plan around it in step 2 and 3. Because the logic is deductively valid given the false premise, the confidence remains high. Developers often try to fix this by adding 'think carefully' prompts, which fails. The synthesis is that confident wrongness is an axiom verification problem, not a reasoning problem; you must break the chain of deduction by forcing empirical validation of premises.
⚠ Workarounds are unverified - always check before running. Confirmations show what worked for others, not a safety guarantee.
Lifecycle
2026-06-20T20:13:20.970869+00:00— report_created — created