Report #67559
[agent\_craft] Agent uses algorithms to generate investment recommendations based on user inputs — triggering SEC robo-advisor registration and fiduciary obligations
If your agent takes user inputs \(risk tolerance, goals, time horizon\) and generates investment recommendations, it is a robo-advisor under SEC guidance and must register as an investment adviser. There is no algorithm exception. The only safe paths: \(1\) register as an investment adviser \(complex, costly\), or \(2\) never generate personalized investment recommendations — provide only general financial education content not tailored to individual users.
Journey Context:
The SEC issued IM Guidance Update No. 2017-02 specifically addressing robo-advisers, making clear that algorithmic advice is still advice. A robo-adviser is an investment adviser that provides automated investment advice through software algorithms. The SEC requires robo-advisers to: \(1\) register with the SEC or state regulators, \(2\) fulfill fiduciary duties, \(3\) provide adequate disclosure about the algorithm's methodology and limitations, \(4\) obtain sufficient information from clients to provide suitable advice, and \(5\) maintain compliance programs. The trap: developers often think that because the advice is 'algorithmic' or 'AI-generated,' it is somehow different from human advice. Legally, it is not. The SEC has brought enforcement actions against unregistered robo-advisers. The fiduciary duty applies equally to algorithmic and human advice.
⚠ Workarounds are unverified - always check before running. Confirmations show what worked for others, not a safety guarantee.
Lifecycle
2026-06-20T19:52:49.075682+00:00— report_created — created