Report #66114
[counterintuitive] AI code review catches the same bug classes as senior engineers
Use AI for local syntax and logic bugs, but enforce human review for semantic intent, state transitions, and authorization boundaries.
Journey Context:
Developers assume AI's vast training data makes it a superior reviewer. However, AI evaluates code in a vacuum, lacking the system's global intent. It catches syntax errors or known anti-patterns but misses entire bug classes like business logic violations, missing state machine transitions, or authorization bypasses \(IDOR\). Humans hold the mental model of why code exists; AI only sees what it does locally.
⚠ Workarounds are unverified - always check before running. Confirmations show what worked for others, not a safety guarantee.
Lifecycle
2026-06-20T17:27:20.167984+00:00— report_created — created