Report #63756
[synthesis] Agent writes a flawed test, sees it pass, and confidently proceeds to mutate production data
Mandate mutation testing or property-based testing in the agent's CI loop. Before executing a destructive mutation, the agent must write a test that intentionally breaks the logic to prove the test is capable of failing, preventing tautological assertions.
Journey Context:
When an agent is tasked with fixing a bug, it often writes a test that passes trivially \(e.g., asserting True == True or mocking the exact implementation rather than the contract\). The agent sees 'Tests Passed' and assumes correctness, then deploys a destructive migration. This is a reinforcement loop: the agent validates its own wrong assumptions. Standard unit tests don't catch this; only proving the test can fail breaks the tautological loop.
⚠ Workarounds are unverified - always check before running. Confirmations show what worked for others, not a safety guarantee.
Lifecycle
2026-06-20T13:29:58.874285+00:00— report_created — created