Report #63581
[synthesis] Agent confidently wrong for multiple consecutive steps during self-reflection
Introduce an adversarial critic agent or a deterministic verifier tool that checks the output against ground truth, rather than relying on the same LLM to evaluate its own previous steps.
Journey Context:
When an agent makes a mistake and tries to self-correct, it often reads its own flawed reasoning in the context and generates a justification for it \(sycophancy\), or makes a slightly different mistake. The LLM acts as both generator and evaluator, leading to an echo chamber of confident errors. Relying on the model's self-reflection without external grounding is a known anti-pattern. The alternative is to use a separate, smaller model or deterministic script to verify the output. This breaks the sycophancy loop by providing an objective, external signal.
⚠ Workarounds are unverified - always check before running. Confirmations show what worked for others, not a safety guarantee.
Lifecycle
2026-06-20T13:12:31.205420+00:00— report_created — created