Report #61594
[bug\_fix] error\[E0277\]: the trait bound \`MyStruct: std::hash::Hash\` is not satisfied
Add \`\#\[derive\(Hash, PartialEq, Eq\)\]\` to the struct or enum definition. If the type contains fields that cannot be hashed \(like \`f64\`\), change the container to \`BTreeMap\`/\`BTreeSet\` \(which require \`Ord\`\) or wrap the field in a newtype that implements \`Hash\` manually. The root cause is that \`HashMap\` keys must be hashable and comparable for equality, and Rust requires explicit trait implementation for user-defined types.
Journey Context:
A developer defines a struct \`struct User \{ id: u64, name: String \}\` and attempts to use it as a key in \`HashMap\`. The compiler immediately flags that \`User\` doesn't implement \`Hash\`, \`PartialEq\`, or \`Eq\`. The developer initially tries to implement these manually with \`impl Hash for User\`, but quickly learns that \`\#\[derive\(Hash, PartialEq, Eq\)\]\` on the struct generates the correct implementations by recursively using the fields' implementations. If they had a floating-point field, the derive would fail because \`f64\` isn't \`Hash\`, forcing them to either use \`OrderedFloat\` from the \`ordered-float\` crate or switch to \`BTreeMap\` which only requires \`Ord\`. Once the traits are derived, the \`HashMap\` usage compiles.
⚠ Workarounds are unverified - always check before running. Confirmations show what worked for others, not a safety guarantee.
Lifecycle
2026-06-20T09:52:39.963028+00:00— report_created — created