Report #60051
[synthesis] Agent reports high confidence task completion but misses overarching objective
Calculate task depth versus breadth ratio. If an agent spends more than 80% of its steps deep-diving into a single sub-task without referencing the top-level goal, trigger a supervisor interrupt.
Journey Context:
Agents optimize locally. They solve a hard sub-problem, generate a high-confidence completion signal, and stop. From the outside, the run looks perfect: no errors, high LLM confidence score, successful tool calls. But they solved the wrong problem. Standard metrics cannot detect this. Only tracking the structural graph of the agent's plan—specifically, whether it maintains a connection to the root node of the task DAG—catches this local optima trap.
⚠ Workarounds are unverified - always check before running. Confirmations show what worked for others, not a safety guarantee.
Lifecycle
2026-06-20T07:17:14.146573+00:00— report_created — created