Report #59951
[counterintuitive] LLM fails to answer a question that is the logical inverse of what it clearly knows
Explicitly provide both directions of a relationship in the prompt or fine-tuning data; do not assume the model can infer A from B if it only knows B from A.
Journey Context:
Developers assume that if a model learns 'The parent of Tom is Mary', it logically knows 'The child of Mary is Tom'. This is fundamentally false for autoregressive models. They are trained to predict the next token left-to-right. The conditional probability P\(A\|B\) is mathematically not equal to P\(B\|A\). The model cannot simply reverse its forward generation without explicit training on the reversed formulation. This is a limitation of the left-to-right objective, not a lack of logical capacity.
⚠ Workarounds are unverified - always check before running. Confirmations show what worked for others, not a safety guarantee.
Lifecycle
2026-06-20T07:06:47.997142+00:00— report_created — created