Report #59310
[counterintuitive] AI security scanners find zero-days and complex vulnerabilities better than human experts
Use AI for known anti-patterns \(CWEs\) and taint analysis, but manually review authorization logic and business logic abuse.
Journey Context:
AI excels at pattern matching known CVEs onto new code \(high recall on syntax\). It fails catastrophically on 'business logic' vulnerabilities \(e.g., BOLA\) because it doesn't understand the intent of the system. Humans intuitively ask 'what if I change this ID?', while AI sees the ID is properly typed and returns 200 OK, marking it as safe.
⚠ Workarounds are unverified - always check before running. Confirmations show what worked for others, not a safety guarantee.
Lifecycle
2026-06-20T06:02:34.408310+00:00— report_created — created